using google should see this， if not， whatever

生活所b

A new approach to China
1/12/2010 03:00:00 PM
Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of  
varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a  
highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate  
infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of  
intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that  
what at first appeared to be solely a security incident--albeit a  
significant one--was something quite different.

First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our  
investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large  
companies from a wide range of businesses--including the Internet,  
finance, technology, media and chemical sectors--have been similarly  
targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those  
companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the  
attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights  
activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack  
did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have  
been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information  
(such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather  
than the content of emails themselves.

Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on  
Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-,  
China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights  
in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties.  
These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at  
Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the  
users' computers.

We have already used information gained from this attack to make  
infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security  
for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would  
advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs  
on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and  
to update their web browsers. Always be cautious when clicking on  
links appearing in instant messages and emails, or when asked to share  
personal information like passwords online. You can read more here  
about our cyber-security recommendations. People wanting to learn more  
about these kinds of attacks can read this U.S. government report  
(PDF), Nart Villeneuve's blog and this presentation on the GhostNet  
spying incident.

We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these  
attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and  
human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because  
this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate  
about freedom of speech. In the last two decades, China's economic  
reform programs and its citizens' entrepreneurial flair have lifted  
hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty. Indeed, this  
great nation is at the heart of much economic progress and development  
in the world today.

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits  
of increased access to information for people in China and a more open  
Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results.  
At the time we made clear that "we will carefully monitor conditions  
in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services.  
If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined  
we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China."

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered--combined with  
the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the  
web--have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of  
our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer  
willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over  
the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government  
the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within  
the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to  
shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

The decision to review our business operations in China has been  
incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-
reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven  
by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or  
involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard  
to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working  
responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.

Posted by David Drummond, SVP, Corporate Development and Chief Legal  
Officer

Permalink

mrs_chen

好长。。。。。。。。

生活所b

一句话，google被河蟹，准备退出中国市场。详情关乎敏感东西，上文有写

LUSEFFAR

河蟹吧,闭关锁国吧,
狗狗也豁出去了,google.cn以前帮着过滤搜索信息,现在连64都可以随便搜了.随便就查了个这段视频出来.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMHLDqenD0o
是打算宁为玉碎不为瓦全吗


大意
TG审核完不够还黑帐户
这么玩我们吃不消不奉陪了
实在不行咱大路朝天各走半边

今天，Google在英文的官方博客声称，Google已经做出决定，重新检讨在中国开展业务的可行性，如有必要，可能会关闭Google.cn，并撤出在中国的办事处。

　　Google称其业务系统遭受到来自中国有针对性的攻击，导致知识产品被盗，Google在2006年进入中国，是为了让中国人能够在更加开放的互联网中获取信息，基于这种理念，Google可以容忍部分审查，但Google会密切注视中国新的法律对Google服务的限制情况，现在Google已经确认，Google已经到了重新考虑评估中国业务运营可行性的时候了。

　　在过去的一年里，对于互联网言论自由的限制已经完全突破了 Google的底线，Google公司已经决定，不愿再审查Google.cn上的搜索结果，因此，如果可能，Google将在未来几周时间和中国当局谈判，要求能够在中国法律框架内运营未经过滤审查的搜索引擎。Google承认这很可能意味着必须关闭Google.cn，撤出Google在中国的办公室。

生活所b

2006年前我使用google搜索还没有在页面下部出现“根据当地法律XXXXXXXX”，现在我连找个数字都要用google.com，因为google.cn会帮我河蟹了，另外不单是搜索内容的被过滤，我们的google账号也一样。这也就是google退出中国市场的导火线——————Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.

生活所b

看来google怒了，上去google.cn搜索数字，赫然排在第一页第一项，跟下面那句河蟹标语非常讽刺~~~~宁为玉碎不为瓦全

justinli

刚才用中国google搜64,第一条和64没关呀,什么"河蟹标语"?

生活所b

我刚才一搜就搜到了啊。。。。“根据当地法律XXXXXXXXXX，某些搜索结果不显示”

生活所b

转载洪波
对Google来说，这是个艰难的决定。对我来说，这是个痛苦的选择。我的大部分在线生活，依托于Google。我使用Google搜索，用Google Reader阅读我订阅的大量内容，用Google Docs处理所有办公文档，用Picasa处理照片并进行地理标注……所有这一切，都没有任何可替代的第三方工具。且不说还有大量的中国企业，比如阿里巴巴，需要依赖Google的搜索和广告进行全球营销。

　　我也知道，在过去四年中，Google一直都存在退出中国的可能，开复像个救火队员一样穿梭斡旋过很多次。今天的结果，大概是Google在对中国业务做了全面评估之后，做出的一个无可奈何的决定。对中国政府来说，既然你需要中国这个市场，你就得听我的招呼。但对Google来说，它更愿意玩一个规则透明的游戏。况且，过去四年动辄得咎的现状，也让Google明白，预期的商业利益，将始终受到严格的限制。而黑箱式的搜索结果屏蔽和妥协，却让它不得不承担越来越大的道义压力。

　　对我来说，Google是全球最好的知识管理工具和生产力工具，但监管当局并不这么看，意识形态是他们更加关心的东西。我相信，Google的这份摊牌声明，也会被看做一种意识形态的花招，招致政府更大的愤怒。在未来的岁月中，我可能不得不费更大的力气去访问那些我已经无法离开的Google工具，这是我必须承受的后果。

　　YouTube、Facebook、Twitter、Blogger、WordPress、Google……全世界最好的网站和服务，一个个远离中国。

　　李彦宏曾说，5年后，大家可能很难看到Google了。我相信，他并不希望看到Google以今天的方式退出中国。与优秀选手同场竞技是一件幸事，尤其是在技术驱动的互联网市场上。